What is wrong with your figure-of-8?

There is one thing about your climbing technique that you probably think you are doing right. Or, more likely, you are doing it right sometimes out of sheer luck. Let´s talk about the nitty-gritty of the figure-of-8!

For most of us, the (rethreaded or follow-through) figure-of-8 was the first specific climbing "thing" we ever learned. It is a standard tool for climbers for good reason. It is strong. It is easy to learn and hard to get wrong. It is easy to inspect. And it is easy to untie.

"Weeell..." you say about the last statement. Maybe you prefer a bowline variation, because when you work those routes and fall a lot, your figure-of-8 gets really hard to untie. Hmmm, maybe we can do something about that. Let´s look at how we usually teach the figure-of-8, and how that can be improved! 

The way I learned, and continued to tie the knot for a long time, was something like this: 

  1. Make a single figure-of-8.
  2. Pass the end of the rope through your harness´ tie in point.
  3. Trace the rope back through the figure-of-8 in whatever way.
  4. Tighten it (a bit).
  5. Make sure you have a super-long tail.
This method works very well. The knot, even if tied quite sloppily, will hold a fall. This is the way most gym visitors will tie in: a loose knot, lots of crossing strands. Messy. But "super safe enough".

Typical figure-of-8 as seen at the gym wall.


A few years later I started getting picky about how I tied and taught this knot. I wanted the strands to be nice and parallel, and I wanted the knot well dressed and tightened from all four ends:

A lot better, but still something missing.


I did not really have a good rationale for this. The thinking went that the knot should be neat, in order to signal heightened attention and care, and perhaps to make the knot really easy to inspect. Really, it was just a bit anal.

Then along came this guy Ben from Lithuania, who runs a Youtube channel called Hard is Easy. Ben systematically investigates different ways of tying the knot, and explains why some people find the figure-of-8 hard to untie. You should really check it out.

The reason we tie the knot so that strands do not cross, and then dress it meticulously, is not to make the knot safer or stronger. We do it to keep it from deforming and seizing up really hard after being loaded. This is all well documented in the video from Hard is Easy. If this was already obvious to you, here is the bonus: Hard is Easy found that it is important to tie the knot so that the loaded strand makes its first loop close to the center of the knot. This further prevents deforming under load.

A properly tied and dressed figure-of-8.


Is this rocket surgery for nerds only? No. Every climber should have a METHOD for tying the figure-of-8 - a muscle-memory sequence that works in the dark, when the zombies are attacking. If you teach the RIGHT method from the start, your students will get all of the above right and never have to think about it ever again. What is this method? I am glad you asked, because I happen to have made a short video:



 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When to talk about the dark side of climbing

Image
People get hurt. People die. Yet climbers will climb and I think this makes the world a better place. So how do we talk about this with our clients? I am not going to provide any answers here, because it is something I wrestle with myself. But I will try to organize my thoughts, and hopefully, this will trigger some input from my readers. The reason we are in this business  - teaching climbers all the survival skills - is that climbing is dangerous. Very dangerous. Every year, lots of people die or get seriously injured in climbing. It seems only natural that we should be transparent about it. Why? Because studying accidents is how we can understand risk, and develop both safety culture and safety technology. On the other hand, ambushing a nervous beginner with tales of death and suffering hardly seems inspirational, does it? What, then, could be the middle ground? I believe that facts and timing matter. Let me explain. The reason we need to talk to students about acciden...
Read more

The Bandwidth Problem, or The Importance of Not Teaching

Image
Remember that we are not a circus. Our job is not to show off the maximum number of tricks.  To teach more, sometimes we need to say less. At the end of a two-day course, my voice is always shot, and I croak my goodbyes like an old frog. For many years, I have tried to practise my own philosophy of teaching, and talking, as little as possible. Yet I keep yabbering on. Whatever country or training system you are working within, you probably follow some kind of syllabus. You are expected to tick a number of boxes: anchors, rappelling, knots, climbing technique, access, grading. Check, check, check. Many participants will greedily ingest everything you throw at them. But people are different. If someone is completely new to the exposure, the engineering, the group - then a day or two at a crag is going to wear him down. Stress, cold, individual learning styles, or group dynamics will further affect his capacity to learn. In the end, it is a simple fact that just pulling from...
Read more

Epiphany: Clipping the shelf when anchoring off a tree

Image
Epiphanies can be big or small. They can be "Eureka" or "Huh, interesting". It is great that even after decades of climbing I can still get that sudden realization and learn something new. Or maybe it´s just a sign that I have not been paying attention. Anyway, one such epiphany was supplied by John Godino at www.AlpineSavvy.com , who has created a great resource for anything related to wilderness travel and climbing. So, when you wrap sling around a big tree and tie it off, you now have four strands disappearing around the trunk. How would you clip the "shelf"? I found that if I did not give it a second thought, I might clip the two top strands. The reason could be that most anchors involving nuts or cams are usually spread out horizontally, and in these cases we clip the two top (or bottom) strands. But if we do the same with our tree-anchor, we will actually be clipping only one loop, which creates a non-redundant anchor. Here are a few pics to ex...
Read more